Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label congress. Show all posts

Monday, January 4, 2016

Meet the congressional candidates of Batangas City

This is a continuation of my thoughts on the congressional race for the newly created lone district of Batangas City. While I do not intend to be judgemental  in my discourse, I desire to share to my readers the importance of choosing the right candidate.

 Danber - The wrong grammar in his personal ad might be an indicator of his lack of depth. No public service experience but only a family name to bank on. I heard of some nasty issues about his subdivision business where titles are being held for a long period of time.

He believes in FOREVER as only dynasts would do.





Bisa - He is definitely a newbie in national politics, but since he is a national labor or union leader, expect him to align with the progressive bloc in Congress if he wins. But if he listens to good advice, and some image work-out, he can initiate a fresh change in the way Batangas is represented in Congress.



Marvey Marino - This Dimacuha son-in-law has an impressive educational background but a pathetic political performance as a councilor and provincial board member. Clearly, his only purpose in public office is to have power. In that way, he can protect the Dimacuhas who will surely face a myriad of criminal cases as soon as they are out of city hall.

The nerve to run as congressman, along with wife Beverly for Mayor is really a blatant insult to the Batanguenos. What else can we think of but that they want total control?


                                                                 



Philip Baroja - former City Administrator and Executive Assistant to the Dimacuhas hails from Lipa City where he had a failed run for councilor decades ago. He found a good start with the Dmacuhas and really served them with utmost loyalty, to a fault. Unfortunately, people are suspicious of his real intention in running. Is he a pawn of one of  the power players inside the dynastic family?


Nani Perez - the most educationally qualified and experienced among the candidates. But he has his own baggage as a former national official - issues that haunt him and his family, including corruption, extortion, abuse of power and a tainted image along with his former "close friend" Gloria Arroyo.

Age has also coped up with him, and his "trapo" image is something he must reckon with. Some comments I heard - it would indeed be best for him to just grow more orchids. 

Consider his statement of withdrawal of his candidacy last year, only to surprise us all before Christmas that he is running after all.


Friday, August 23, 2013

NO TO PORK BARREL, IN WHATEVER FORM

Pork barrel is the appropriation of government spending for localized projects secured solely or primarily to bring money to a representative's district. The usage originated in American English.In election campaigns,the term is used in derogatory fashion to attack opponents. Scholars, however, use it as a technical term regarding legislative control of local appropriations. - Wikipedia.

When members of Congress try to gain federal funds for projects in their district or state, they are often accused of playing “pork barrel politics.” This curious expression dates back
to the days of plantation slavery before the Civil War, when field hands dipped into large barrels of salt pork for their food. Similarly, those senators and representatives who win special projects for their constituents are “bringing home the bacon.”

Legislation authorizing improvements in rivers and harbors, flood control and dams, construction of federal buildings, and highway construction traditionally caused members to scramble to get something in for their state or district. More recently, energy and defense appropriations bills have attracted pork barrel amendments. Members of Congress defend their pork barrel efforts as a way of more evenly distributing federal money throughout the nation. But critics charge that Congress often diverts funds to projects and places not out of national need but to enhance members' chances of reelection. Senator Norris Cotton (Republican–New Hampshire), who served on the Appropriations Committee, spoke for many when he called pork barrel politics “one of the worst features of the whole system of federal grants and subsidies.”

Pork barrel politics has become associated with a variety of colorful legislative terms. When members seize upon a bill that the President is likely to sign into law and then add pork barrel amendments, it is called a “Christmas tree” bill. Special projects are hung upon the bill the way ornaments adorn a
 Christmas tree. When Congress specifies exactly where and how federal money should be spent—for example, specifying the awarding of a grant to a certain university to conduct weapons research—it is “earmarking” the funds, just as some farm animals are marked on the ear to identify who owns them. And when members trade their votes for each other's pork barrel projects, the practice is called “logrolling.” This expression dates back to the frontier practice of neighbors working together to clear their farmland and gather logs for building their homes, barns, and fences. Whoever helped his neighbors in logrolling would receive their help in return.
Sources: Norris Cotton, In the Senate: Amidst the Conflict and the Turmoil (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1978)

IN THE PHILIPPINES, WE CALL IT THE PDAF or priority development assistance fund

EACH SENATOR IS ENTITLED TO Php 200 million and EACH CONGRESSMAN, Php 70 million every year. Worst, some of them think they OWN THE MONEY.

Sa literal na pagsasalin sa Filipino, ibig sabihin nito ay “bariles ng karneng baboy.” Pero sa pamahalaan, ang ibig sabihin nito ay pondo ng gobyerno na maaaring gastusin depende sa proyektong ituturo ng isang mambabatas. Ang siste, may porsyento sya, kaya nasasakripisyo ang pagawain o proyektong pambayan. Ang masaklap, naging mas magaling sila ngayon para mas pakinabangan ang mga pondo – sa paglilipat nito sa mga pribadong organisasyon o non-government organizations (NGOs), na kung hindi man peke, ay pini-peke ang kagastusan para maibulsa ang pera.


But even  the President has the following PORK BARREL at his disposal:


Special purpose funds are:

- Budgetary support to state-owned corporations - P45.7 billion

- Allocations to local government units - P19.7 billion 

- Calamity fund P7.5 billion

- Contigent fund - P1 billion

- DepEd school building program - P1 billion

- E-government fund - P2.479 billion

- International commitments fund - P4.8 billion

- Miscellaneous personnel benefits fund - P80.7 billion

- Pension and gratuity fund - 120.5 billion

- PDAF - P25.420 billion

- Feasibility studies fund - P400 million

Total: P229.526 billion

Un-programmed funds are:

- Budgetary support to government-owned and controlled corporations - P36.268 million

- Support to foreign-assisted projects - P16.124 billion

- General fund adjustments - P1 billion

- Support for infra projects and social programs - P56.349 billion

- AFP modernization program - P10.349 billion

- Debt management program - P10.894 billion

- Risk management program - P30 billion

- People's survival fund - P500 million

Total: P139.904 billion

Under the President's control

Another item is the budget for school buildings worth P200 billion. 

And this is how they managed to siphon the PEOPLE'S MONEY.

http://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/35210-pdaf-collusion-solons-choose-ngos